FrontierPhysics v0.1 with 56 tasks

FrontierPhysics: Evaluating Agents for End-to-End Physics Research

182submissions56tasks9domains7modalities42researchers38institutions

Agent Performance

0%5%10%15%20%25%240 min120 min60 min30 min15 minavg agent wall-clock per rollout (log)overall pass ratemost efficient ↗fleet 6.9%Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Astra (max)GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6 Astra (xhigh)Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6 SolClaude Opus 5GPT-5.6 Sol (max)Grok 4.7Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.6 Luna (max)GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh)Grok 4.6GPT-5.6 Terra (max)GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh)GLM-5.3MiMo V2.6 ProGPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh)Kimi K3DeepSeek V4 ProGemini 3.8 Flash
Hover a point to pin its exact pass rate and wall-clock to the axes. Dashed lines mark fleet means; the emerald line is the Pareto frontier.

Failure Modes

GPT-6 Astra (xhigh)

Fully human-reviewed labels for 168 agent rollouts

One square per rollout · 56 tasks × 3 trialsRIG68 of 168
Agent failuresn · % of 143 failed
Grading errors

Also in the taxonomy

Hover a tag or a square · a rollout can carry several tags, so the shares add up to more than 100%

Agent Leaderboard

Sort by
#AgentOverall
1
Claude Opus 5.5Claude Code
22.6%
2
GPT-6 Astra (max)Codex
17.9%
3
GPT-6.1 SolCodex
16.1%
4
GPT-6 Astra (xhigh)Codex
14.9%
5
Claude Fable 5.1Claude Code
13.1%
6
GPT-6 SolCodex
11.3%
7
Claude Opus 5Claude Code
10.1%
8
GPT-5.6 Sol (max)Codex
8.3%
9
Grok 4.7Grok Build
6.5%
10
Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Code
4.2%
11
GPT-5.6 Luna (max)Codex
3.6%
12
GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh)Codex
3.0%
13
Grok 4.6Grok Build
3.0%
14
GPT-5.6 Terra (max)Codex
3.0%
15
GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh)Codex
1.8%
16
GLM-5.3Claude Code
1.2%
17
MiMo V2.6 ProClaude Code
1.2%
18
GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh)Codex
1.2%
19
Kimi K3Claude Code
0.6%
20
DeepSeek V4 ProClaude Code
0.6%
21
Gemini 3.8 FlashAntigravity
0.0%
Hover over a row to see confidence intervals, time and cost. Score is 0–100: a passing rollout's weighted rubric score, 0 for any failure.
FrontierPhysics · 17 models · 21 configurations · 56 tasks · 3 trials per task · 95% CIs
Anthropic
OpenAI
xAI
Z.ai
Xiaomi
Moonshot
DeepSeek
Google

Cost Efficiency

0%5%10%15%20%25%$50$20$10$5$2$1$0.50mean inference cost per rollout (USD, log)overall pass ratemost cost-efficient ↗fleet 6.9%Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 Astra (max)GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6 Astra (xhigh)Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6 SolClaude Opus 5GPT-5.6 Sol (max)Grok 4.7Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-5.6 Luna (max)GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh)Grok 4.6GPT-5.6 Terra (max)GPT-5.6 Terra (xhigh)GLM-5.3MiMo V2.6 ProGPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh)Kimi K3DeepSeek V4 ProGemini 3.8 Flash
Hover a point to pin its exact pass rate and cost to the axes. Dashed lines mark fleet means; the emerald line is the Pareto frontier. GLM-5.3's cost is an estimate from token usage at list prices.

Physics-Domain Profile

204060Condensed MatterPhysicsAMO PhysicsQuantumInformationAstrophysicsFluidDynamicsStatisticalPhysicsPhotonics &ImagingHigh EnergyPhysicsChemicalPhysics
Condensed Matter Physics12 tasks
Claude Opus 5.5Claude Code41.7 → 30.6%
GPT-6 Astra (max)Codex33.3 → 27.8%
Grok 4.7Grok Build27.8 → 16.7%

solid = overall pass · pale = passed the verifier only · hover another radar axis to switch domain

Claude Opus 5.5· Claude CodeGPT-6 Astra (max)· CodexGrok 4.7· Grok Buildrings at 20–60% · overall pass

Tasks

A figure from a FrontierPhysics task in Condensed Matter Physics
Condensed Matter Physics
A figure from a FrontierPhysics task in AMO Physics
AMO Physics
A figure from a FrontierPhysics task in Quantum Information
Quantum Information
A figure from a FrontierPhysics task in Astrophysics
Astrophysics
A figure from a FrontierPhysics task in Fluid Dynamics
Fluid Dynamics
A figure from a FrontierPhysics task in Statistical Physics
Statistical Physics

Figure credits